No dia 6 de Dezembro a Eurosurveillance, revista que publicou o artigo-lixo do protocolo PCR de Drosten et al, publicou o seguinte
December 6, 2020, 07:15 PM
Volume 25, Issue 48, 03/Dec/2020 Editorial note We have recently received correspondence regarding a paper published this year, questioning both the content and the editorial procedures used to evaluate the article prior to publication. We can assure our readers and authors that we take comments relating to scientific content, the processing of articles and editorial transparency seriously. All articles published by the journal are peer-reviewed by at least two independent experts in the field (or at least one in the case of rapid communications). The article in question was also peer-reviewed by two experts on whose recommendation the decision to publish was made. Eurosurveillance is seeking further expert advice and discussing the current correspondence in detail. We will, according to our existing procedures, evaluate the claims and make a decision as soon as we have investigated in full. In the meantime, it would be unfair to all concerned to comment or discuss further until we have looked at all the issues. Details on the editorial policies and processes are available here. https://www.eurosurveillance.org/con….25.48.2012031
Last edited by sharon sanders; December 6, 2020, 07:47 PM. Reason: added date
Ou seja, garantem que estão a analisar o artigo. Curiosamente passaram-se 11 dias. Relembro que o artigo foi publicado de um dia para o outro quando a média de revisão por pares da revista é de 35 dias, numa altura que havia menos de 10 mortos pelo virus. Uma urgência injustificada em publicar, uma lentidão criminosa em retrair.
Relembro que vários artigos que questionam a eficácia das máscaras foram retirados solicitamente pelas revistas que os tinham publicado.
Dois pesos, trinta medidas. Muito sangue escorre nas mãos desta gente sem escrupulos.
